top of page
Completed

NCT01971658: Phase 3: Efficacy Study Comparing VTD Versus VCD as Induction NDMM - IFM2013-04

Updated: May 21, 2022

IFM2013-04


NCT01971658: Phase 3: Efficacy Study Comparing Velcade Dexamethasone Thalidomide Versus Velcade Cyclophosphamide Dexamethasone as Induction Treatment in the Initial Management of Multiple Myeloma (IFM2013-04) (IFM2013-04)


ifm2013

Efficacy Study Comparing Velcade Dexamethasone Thalidomide Versus Velcade Cyclophosphamide Dexamethasone as Induction Treatment in the Initial Management of Multiple Myeloma (IFM2013-04) (IFM2013-04)


This is a phase III, multicenter, prospective with a clinical benefit, open-label and randomized study to compare two different treatments : Velcade (Bortezomib) Thalidomide Dexamethasone (VTD) versus Velcade (Bortezomib) Cyclophosphamide Dexamethasone (VCD) as an Induction Treatment prior to Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in patients with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma.


Eligible patients will be randomized into 2 treatment arms. Each patient will receive 4 consecutive 21 day cycles of an induction treatment with either VTD or VCD.


Sponsor:

Nantes University Hospital


Location:

France


ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01971658


Official Title: A PHASE III STUDY OF VELCADE (BORTEZOMIB) THALIDOMIDE DEXAMETHASONE (VTD) VERSUS VELCADE (BORTEZOMIB) CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE DEXAMETHASONE (VCD) AS AN INDUCTION TREATMENT PRIOR TO AUTOLOGOUS STEM CELL TRANSPLANTATION IN PATIENTS WITH NEWLY DIAGNOSED MULTIPLE MYELOMA."

First Posted : October 29, 2013


 



 

Drug: Thalidomide®

Drug: Cyclophosphamide

Drug: Velcade®

Drug: Dexaméthasone

 

31. Clinical Autologous Transplantation: Results I| December 3, 2015

Bortezomib, Thalidomide and Dexamethasone (VTD) Is Superior to Bortezomib, Cyclophosphamide and Dexamethasone (VCD) Prior to Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for Patients with De Novo Multiple Myeloma. Results of the Prospective IFM 2013-04 Trial


Conclusion

This trial is the first prospective randomized comparison of 4 cycles of VTD versus 4 cycles of VCD administered as induction therapy prior to ASCT. VTD was shown to be significantly superior to VCD in terms of VGPR and PR rates. Neuropathy rates low in both arms, while neutropenia was more frequent with VCD.





Posts Archive
bottom of page